|
|
|
¹ÚÀÎÈñ ( Park In-Hee ) - ½Å¼º´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
¼¿¬¿Á ( Suh Yeon-Ok ) - ¼øõÇâ´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
Purpose: The purpose of this methodological study was to develop a teaching efficacy scale for clinical nursing instructors and to establish its validity and reliability.
Methods: Based on the literature review and focus group interviews, the attributes of the roles and capabilities of clinical nursing instructors were identified and a scale was developed. The content validity test and preparatory investigation were conducted to produce a total of 54 questions of the study.
Results: Factor analysis indicated six factors whose eigenvalue was 1 or greater. Cumulative dispersion explained by the factors was the combined 67.3%. In the final analysis, forty-two questions were selected. The ¡°Student instruction¡± factor showed high loadings with 12 questions and explained 17.4% of total variance. The ¡°Teaching improvement¡± factor was loaded with 9 questions; ¡°Application of Teaching and Learning¡± 7 questions; ¡°Interpersonal relationship and communication,¡± 7 questions; ¡°Clinical judgement¡± 4 questions; ¡°Clinical skill instruction¡± 3 questions. The overall reliability of the tools measured with Cronbach's was .97.
Conclusion: All these findings confirmed that the teaching efficacy scale for clinical nursing instructors have content validity, construct validity, and criterion-related validity, and all questions are internally consistent and reliable.
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
°£È£ÇÐ, ±³¼ö, Çлý
Nursing, Teaching, Students
|
|
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
|
|